tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9738192.post112973400217010233..comments2023-12-30T11:06:11.492-06:00Comments on Brent's Blog: Not the Wright SolutionBrent Clantonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12626330033327572236noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9738192.post-1132610243184934622005-11-21T15:57:00.000-06:002005-11-21T15:57:00.000-06:00Here's a timeline to "anonymous 3" from the Dallas...Here's a timeline to "anonymous 3" from the Dallas Morning News website concerning the Wright Amendment: <BR/><BR/>"1968: Dallas and Fort Worth, under pressure from the federal government, agree to build a regional airport to replace Dallas Love Field. The airlines serving Love pledge to move to the new airport. <BR/><BR/>1971: Southwest Airlines launches its flights to Houston and San Antonio. <BR/><BR/>1973: Dallas and Fort Worth sue to try to force Southwest to move to the new airport. A federal judge allows Southwest to remain at Love Field. <BR/><BR/>1974: Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport opens. <BR/><BR/>1978: Congress deregulates commercial aviation, allowing carriers to set their own fares and plan their own routes. <BR/><BR/>1979: In a compromise involving all the parties, Congress approves the Wright amendment, named after U.S. House Speaker Jim Wright of Fort Worth. The law limits flights to Texas and adjoining states but allows commuter planes with 56 seats or fewer to fly farther."<BR/><BR/>You can see from this timeline that Southwest was the one that snuck in, not Jim Wright, to service Love Field when all the other carriers agreed with the Federal Government to close down both airports in Dallas and Fort Worth. <BR/><BR/><BR/>Love Field should be closed. Southwest litigated to keep it open - D/FW was just protecting its federally mandated position from Southwest trying to get a monopoly out of Love. Even Southwest knew that they had won when the Wright Amendment was enacted: "Southwest chairman Herb Kelleher quoted in Financial World: 'Operationally, it’s extremely difficult, but I pledged we wouldn’t seek to overturn it,' in reference to the Wright amendment." (DMN) <BR/><BR/>Now they're just getting greedy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9738192.post-1131683079207879902005-11-10T22:24:00.000-06:002005-11-10T22:24:00.000-06:00In response to Han, you say Southwest should honor...In response to Han, you say Southwest should honor the agreement made when the Wright Ammendment was written, but Southwest never agreed to it.<BR/>The Wright Ammendment was sneakily added to another bill by Jim Wright from Fort Worth to protect DFW and American Airlines from competition. American had tried for years to sue Southwest into bankruptcy before Southwest even took their first flight.<BR/>The courts continually agreed that Southwest had as much right to fly as anyone else and they even indicted several airline executives for harassing Southwest and conspiring to bankrupt them.<BR/>All Southwest wants is the right to compete--something that American is afraid to do.<BR/>As for why doesn't Soutwest fly out of DFW--it is more costly and delays are worse. Delta just pulled out of there because they couldn't make things work there either. <BR/>If the government told your favorite restaraunt they had to close because they were causing other places to lose money would you support that law. Why don't they close pass a law against Home Depot because Sears is losing money?<BR/>The bottom line is that no matter which airline you prefer or which airport you prefer, the Wright Ammendment prevents fair competition. It was designed with the sole purpose of putting Southwest out of business. <BR/>Southwest has managed to stay profitable and never lay off an employee while American has pulled out of markets and layed off many employees long before talk of repealing the Wright Ammendment. <BR/>Where there is a demand for air travel, someone will fill it. Should we all feel sorry for American and pass special laws to give them an advantage just because their executives can't figure out how to make things work? I don't think so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9738192.post-1131393594529035282005-11-07T13:59:00.000-06:002005-11-07T13:59:00.000-06:00We must ask why the Wright Amendment was put in pl...We must ask why the Wright Amendment was put in place in the first place. The thinking was that the state did not want to pay for both Dallas and Fort Worth airports so both airports were supposed to close down to make way for the consolidated DFW. Then Southwest snuck in, seeing an opportunity at the now abandoned Love Field, and after much politics, the Wright Amendment allowed Southwest to stay at DAL (which should not have been their right to do) as long as abided by restrictions of flying to neighboring states. Now 30 plus years later, Southwest wants to capitalize on the monopoly they have at Love Field to fly to all other destinations domestically. So why doesn't Southwest just begin operations at DFW where all the other carriers are flying out of? Southwest says that since DFW is based on the hub and spoke system, it does not think the airport is viable to its point-to-point operations. Well then why would Southwest announce service at DEN beginning 2006 when DEN is a monstrous hub for United?? Southwest says it wants a free competitive market. If it moved to DFW (where ATA, another low cost carrier already operates), it will get its free competitive market. <BR/><BR/>So then what will happen to DAL if the Wright Amendment is repealed? Most likely, the Master Plan that restricts growth at Love Field will go away so that American, Continental and the like can come in and operate, competively. What's that mean to Dallasites? More traffic and congestion along the already congested highways and more air traffic noise. What could be good for local passengers is the available markets, especially international which would be served by airlines other than Southwest. Of course, one version of the bill will restrict travel from DAL to the US only, further solidifying Southwest's dominance in the domestic market. What many people don't know is that Southwest is not the small little airline anymore: Southwest is the largest domestic carrier based on passengers boarded.<BR/><BR/>What does this mean for connecting passengers? Well smaller and more unprofitable markets that depend on connectivity will most likely be dropped because flights will have to be spread out between DFW and DAL. Southwest contends that it is American's choice to drop these markets and it won't have much effect because some other carrier will come along and pick them up. Does this really make sense for any airline, with the state of the industry today, to pick up an unprofitable route if it can't leverage the connectivity through a large hub? So Southwest should really consider picking up those markets to allow Joe Six-Pack from Smallville, USA to travel, but Southwest of course wouldn't do that, using the excuse that it is P2P and small, unprofitable routes are the antithesis of its business model. Basically, Southwest is saying screw Lobbock, we need to get more seniors out to Vegas.<BR/><BR/>What about Mid-Cities residents? Sure DAL will grow and it will be quasi-more convenient to get to the airport (after fighting off the increased traffic). But there are a lot of travelers living in Fort Worth, Hurst, Bedford, Euless, Grapevine etc. that benefit from DFW's locality and the number of markets it serves. If a bunch of flights get shifted to Love, then Dallas will see an influx of disgruntled Mid Cities/Fort Worth travelers clogging up 183, 114, 635 etc. Then you have the DFW employees that will either be laid off or have to commute to DAL, which would congest traffic even more. <BR/><BR/>What should Southwest do? It should honor the agreement it made when the Wright Amendment was written. The airline has flourished while the other carriers are either bankrupt or close to it. If Southwest dominates the market anymore, that's good for Southwest, bad for travelers because that means many markets will be ignored and probably spit upon. Southwest should try its hand at DFW. There are plenty of gates, and with the number of carriers, there would be much more free competition than at the restricted Love Field. I have nothing against Southwest; I just don't want them to create a false image of themselves as the persecuted one, when in fact, they are the biggest domestic carrier and have been profitable for 32 consecutive years when other airlines are struggling to honor its pensions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9738192.post-1131325613995375702005-11-06T19:06:00.000-06:002005-11-06T19:06:00.000-06:00Far more damning are Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison's c...Far more damning are Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison's close financial ties with the DFW Airport Board.<BR/><BR/>Her husband has served as their attorney for nearly 40 years.<BR/><BR/>As goes DFW Airport, so goes KBH's checkbook.<BR/><BR/>Incredibly, she's refusing to recuse herself from the Wright Amendment hearing scheduled for Nov. 10.<BR/><BR/>Conflict of interest, anyone?<BR/><BR/>Ethics violation... anyone, anyone?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9738192.post-1130801809708445852005-10-31T17:36:00.000-06:002005-10-31T17:36:00.000-06:00The real reason most politicans are against repeal...The real reason most politicans are against repeal of the Wright Ammendment is THEY get upgraded on American to business or first class when they fly and Southwest can't do that for them. If they come out for SW they will be blackballed by AA and be forced to pay more or ride coach. This is not only out of Dallas but all over the country and AA flys to more places than SW. AA also upgrades the families of the politico's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com